Static Application Security Testing Tools 2026

Static Application Security Testing tools analyze source code, binaries, or compiled artifacts to help identify security issues before release. Use this category to compare options for code analysis, DevSecOps workflows, and application security testing across teams and languages.

6

Available Tools

Static Application Security Testing Tools

V
Veracode

Veracode

Empower your application security with Veracode's comprehensive testing and analytics solutions.

0.00 (0)
Commercial
C
Checkmarx

Checkmarx

Empower your development with Checkmarx's comprehensive application security solutions.

0.00 (0)
Commercial
S
SonarQube

SonarSource

Elevate your code quality and security with SonarQube's comprehensive analysis tools.

0.00 (0)
Freemium
F
Fortify

Micro Focus

Comprehensive application security testing for enterprise-level protection.

0.00 (0)
Commercial
b
binskim

binskim

Secure your binaries with Binskim's advanced static analysis tool for comprehensive vulnerability detection.

0.00 (0)
Commercial
S
SOOS DAST

SOOS DAST

Empower your development team with SOOS DAST for robust application security and compliance.

0.00 (0)
Commercial

About Static Application Security Testing

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools help security and development teams find potential vulnerabilities earlier in the software lifecycle by analyzing code without running the application. This category includes tools used for secure code review, application security testing, and broader DevSecOps programs where teams want to identify issues before software is deployed.

When comparing SAST tools, start with the languages, frameworks, and build environments you need to support. Some products are better suited to enterprise teams with large codebases and multiple repositories, while others are designed for simpler workflows or smaller teams. It is also important to review how each tool fits into your development process, including IDE integrations, CI/CD support, reporting, and how findings are delivered to developers and security teams.

Another key evaluation point is the quality of the findings. Look for tools that help reduce noise, explain why a finding matters, and make it easier to prioritize remediation. Static analysis can surface issues such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, path traversal, credential leaks, and information disclosure, but the usefulness of the tool depends on how clearly it presents risk and context.

Teams should also consider whether they need only SAST or a broader application security platform. Some products in this category may be part of a larger security testing stack that includes DAST, software composition analysis, IAST, runtime protection, or related vulnerability management capabilities. If your organization needs coverage across source code, dependencies, and runtime behavior, it may be useful to compare how each tool supports those workflows.

Compliance and governance requirements can also influence selection. Buyers often look for tools that help support internal security policies and frameworks such as OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, NIST, SOC 2, HIPAA, or GDPR-related controls. The right fit depends on how well the tool supports audit-ready reporting, policy enforcement, and repeatable scanning across teams.

Use this category to compare static application security testing tools by deployment model, integration options, language coverage, and reporting depth. The best choice is the one that fits your development process, helps your team act on findings quickly, and supports the security outcomes your organization needs.